Discussion:
WHITE GENOCIDE
(too old to reply)
d***@gmail.com
2012-06-26 18:34:17 UTC
Permalink
media Release
ANC is not interested in peaceful solution
The Boer Afrikaner Assembly noted with concern the increased racial tension that currently prevails in South Africa with references even reference to war reported in the media. The cause of this increased racial tension is the decision of the ANC his Youth League to intensify the the land grab program, as expressed by the acting President of the league, Ronald Lamola. The consequences are the increased attacks and murders of whites. The ANC regime will have to realize that a people can only so long and watch its members murdered without doing something about it. No nation can allow an organization like the ANC revolution taking place at the expense of that nation's members' property and lives. The Boer Afrikaner Assembly presented a peaceful solution to the ANC regime, but it is apparent that the ANC is not interested in a peaceful solution and is rather interested rather wishes an increase in ferocity of its members. Should the regime come to its senses, the Boer Afrikaner Assembly is still willing to talk to about die Boer African People's right to self-determination, that the only viable and peaceful solution to the racial tensions and threatening racial war in South Africa.
Boer Afrikaner Assembly
"It's Genocide"
Those who listen regularly to this program know that I am steadfastly opposed
to what is called "The New World Order," that is, I am opposed to the
establishment of world government under the United Nations and other
international entitles.
The establishment of world government, which is taking place now and has been
taking place since the War to Impose the New World Order ended in 1945, will
mean the end of American freedom.
We have reached the point where the President of the United States feels more
obligated to obtain United Nations permission for US military action than he
feels obligated to obtain authorization from Congress.
Since we are so far down this dangerous road, I think it is wise to step back
and look at the ostensible purposes of the United Nations, and how well its
actions stand up to its professed principles.
One of those professed principles is opposition to genocide, that is, the
attempted destruction of a people. Let us look at the UN's definition of
genocide.
-- Acts Constituting Genocide --
-- Article II --
In the present Convention, "genocide" means any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
----------
Genocide, by the above definition, applies to national groups, including
Americans; and ethnic groups, including people of European descent in the
United States and South Africa; as much as any other groups. It is my
contention that the people of European descent of this world are the targets of
a constant, consistent, systematic, sustained campaign of genocide, with the
intention of humiliating, subjugating, and eventually eliminating our people.
This is being accomplished on two levels: by means of both overt and covert
government coercion; and by means of both an open psychological warfare
campaign and, using sophisticated "psywar" techniques, a subliminal "psywar"
campaign.
Think about racial integration. The laws which formerly protected the freedom
of association of different racial groups, who in all of recorded history have
shown a strong tendency to segregate themselves and evinced a strong desire to
live among their own kind and by their own values, were all reversed by illegal
decrees of a leftist Supreme Court, until today freedom of association is
virtually illegal, except, so far, in the bedroom. All human societies, and
indeed all forms of higher life on this planet, require an exclusive territory
for their survival. Nations and species both defend their territories,
sometimes unto death, because that truth is graven upon their hearts at a very
deep, instinctual level. It is this inner knowledge of the need for an
exclusive territory that makes us naturally group together along ethnic lines
and makes our young men willing to fight and die to keep our territory -- our
country -- for ourselves. We cannot survive unless we have a territory
exclusively our own. Integration takes that away from us.
According to section C of the Genocide Convention, "genocide" is "Deliberately
inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part." One look at the interracial murder
and interracial rape statistics put out by the FBI is enough for any reasonable
person to see that Americans of European descent have been under a constant
physical assault, due in no small part to the promotion of "integration." And
"integration" has destroyed our criminal justice system; the guilty often go
unpunished or the innocent are persecuted, not on the basis of the evidence,
but based on the racial composition of the jury, which is acknowledged even by
the news media to be one of the most important factors in the outcome of a
trial.
One particularly horrible consequence of "integration" is the forced taking of
our innocent little children, some of them only five years old, and bussing
them into the Third World war zones that so many of our cities have become; or
bussing the warring gangs into our neighborhoods -- all in the name of
"integration." According to section E of the Genocide Convention, genocide is
defined as "Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group." Even
though decent and thoughtful members of many races have been against it from
the beginning, our masters are now accelerating a push to promote interracial
adoption as a government policy, opposition to which will be punishable by law.
This also fits the definition of genocide under section E.
Section B of the Genocide Convention defines genocide as "Causing serious
bodily or mental harm to members of the group." We have discussed bodily harm
-- what about mental harm? To be healthy, every child and every adult must have
a positive sense of identity. In the United States, our schools used to teach
our children about the positive contributions of our race, which founded
America and Western Civilization itself. We taught our children to respect the
cultures of other peoples, yes, but also to revere and honor our people's
achievements, from the _Iliad_ to Shakespeare, from Stonehenge to the
transistor to the walk on the moon. And they were acknowledged as _our_
achievements! But under the current regime of Political Correctness it is
considered evil to acknowledge the fact that ours is a European civilization.
Our achievements may not be mentioned in class or textbook unless in the same
breath an African, an Oriental, or a lesbian Communist is given equal billing,
and historical accuracy be damned!
The desire of people to live among their own kind is called "racism," and guilt
for this imagined sin is inculcated among our young people in almost every
book, television program, motion picture or even computer game that is made
available to them. They are told that their ancestors, who built America and
the West, were wrong and that only the Communist-inspired "civil rights"
revolution of the last few decades has finally set things right. They are
spoon-fed a moral outlook on the world in which anything which tends to the
survival and advancement of White Americans is deemed evil, and everything
which tends to our extinction is deemed good, by definition. This alien
morality, which does no race any good except our self-appointed masters, has
grievously injured two entire generations of our people. It is sick -- it is
evil -- and it is undoubtedly genocide -- "causing serious mental harm to the
members of the group."
Section D of the Genocide Convention defines genocide as "imposing measures
intended to prevent births within the group." Ask yourself this question: What
has been the demographic result of all the so-called "feminist" agitation of
the last few decades? Has it resulted in a significant reduction in the numbers
of the Third Worlders now crowding our cities? Are illegal Mexican immigrant
women or inner city welfare mothers now taking up careers and foregoing
children until they're nearly forty? Or is it traditional European-American
women who have decided that there are things more important than the creation
and raising of the next generation of our people?
We as a people are not even replacing ourselves. We are starting our families
later if at all, and few women have the three children necessary to maintain
our numbers. The promotion of abortion on demand has also made little dent in
the mushrooming population of non-Americans within our borders, but it has
convinced many millions of our own people that slaying their children in the
womb, for no better reason than personal convenience, is a good and laudable
idea. A whole generation has thus been killed and will never see the light of
day -- yet another reason why the portion of the population of European descent
is in precipitous decline.
Other anti-birth policies include the media and government campaigns to promote
and legitimize homosexuality.
Is there an identifiable power structure within America which is "imposing
measures intended to prevent births within the group"? You bet there is!
We have not yet addressed section A of the convention, "killing members of the
group," but when the New World Order boys have succeeded in disarming us we
shall see what their intentions really are in that regard.
Also ongoing is a slow war against us now being waged in our inner cities; and
there is also the fact, exposed many times on this program, that most of the
wars of this century have been engineered for the benefit of the New World
Order elitists -- and it is our fathers, brothers, and sons who do the dying.
Is multi-racialism genocide? Yes it is.
Is multi-culturalism genocide? Yes it is.
Is teaching minorities self esteem while teaching Whites "sensitivity"
genocide? Yes it is.
Is diversity indoctrination genecide? Yes it is.
Is toleration of illegal immigration genocide? Yes it is.
Is any non-White immigration, except perhaps for diplomatic and consular
representatives, genocide? Yes it is.
Do anti-discrimination laws constitute genocide? Yes they do.
Do "hate crime" laws constitute genocide? Yes they do.
Does support of convenience abortion constitute genocide? Yes it does.
Does promotion of homosexual-ity constitute genocide? Yes it does.
Is suppression of information on racial differences genocide? Yes it is.
Is inhibiting research on racial differences genocide? Yes it is.
Is "affirmative action" genocide? Yes it is.
Is the subliminal or overt promo-tion of interracial sex on TV genocide? Yes it
is.
Does failure to provide equal me-dia time to Whites to further their cause,
constitute genocide? Yes it does.
Does the undermining of loyalty of White Americans to their own people
constitute genocide? Yes it does.
Does undermining the sovereignty of our nation and the promotion of world
government constitute genocide? Yes it does.
It is not necessary to use gas chambers to commit genocide.
Some of our own people, in order to gain favor with a treacherous and disloyal
elite, find it to their own advantage to sacrifice the integrity of our country
and our people, for money or power. Some of our people would rather surrender
and grovel than fight. As long as they are able to go along to get along, they
pretend to ignore the decay and collapse of our civilization brought about as a
direct result of the genecidal program being imposed upon us. I believe the day
is coming when they must answer for their treason. If that day does come, and I
believe it will, they will find their answers falling on deaf ears. 'Treason,
how be it punished...?"
Those who promote the New World Order today are the spiritual and in some cases
the physical cousins of those who founded Communism. Though the overtly
Communist attempt at world government foundered on its economic failures, we
make a big mistake if we think that the danger is passed. Those who created
Communism in the first place as an instrument for world control are very much
alive, and their evil dream of world government is now being achieved. They
have always been friendly toward Communism, though they favor its objectives
secretly. They use code words like "restoring democracy" while they impose
Communist tyrannies on South Africa and Haiti. They hate all races, but they
especially hate our race -- for our nations, once awakened, have the potential
for defeating their evil schemes.
Let us see whether or not the current plan for "integration" matches Communist
objectives.
England's leading Communist writer in the early part of the twentieth century
had long range plans for the race problem.
He had this to say in his book, _A Racial Program for the 20th Century_, as
"In America, we will aim for a subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro
minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instill in the whites a guilt
complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise
to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of
sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to
intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to
our cause." (Check the Record, it's really there!)
Well, there it is. Straight from the horse's mouth. I want you to pay
particular attention to the statement, and I emphasize: "...we will endeavour
to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the
Negroes." Despite the fall of the Soviet Union, the Soviet psychological
warfare people, with the help of their agents of influence in the West, have
succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
Now, I personally believe it is time to undo, by every legal means possible,
the greatest Soviet psychological warfare triumph. In fact it is the greatest
triumph for any psychological warfare campaign ever waged -- racial
"integration" in the United States. Of course the Communists' powerful allies
helped, and these "helpers" are very much with us today in America.
In 1928 Communist writer Joseph Pogany was sent to the United States by Moscow
with the mission of implementing the Soviet racial agenda in America. Writing
in the Communist newspaper, _The Daily Worker_, under the name of Joseph
Schwartz, this Communist laid out his party's program for the racial
destruction of this country.
1. Abolition of the whole system of race discrimination and insure full racial
equality;
2. Insure the Negroes the right to vote;
3. Abolish all Jim Crow laws and forbid discrimination against Negroes in
selling or renting houses;
4. Abolish all laws forbidding intermarriage of persons of different races;
5. Assure full integration of public schools and universities;
6. The equal admittance of Negroes to railway stations, waiting rooms, hotels,
restaurants and theaters;
7. Full integration of the Army and Navy;
8. Allow Negroes to join all labor unions;
9. Equal employment opportunities for Negroes.
Now, do these measures have a familiar ring to them? Of course they do.
This is what became the American "civil rights" movement. This was the
blueprint. People tell us that "integration" will make us a better and stronger
country. Do you believe that the Soviets would have done anything to make our
country stronger or better? Do you expect me to believe that? To anyone who was
gullible enough to accept all or any part of this agenda I say this: Lenin had
an expression for you. He would refer to those in the West who consciously or
unconsciously served Soviet interests as his "useful idiots."
At this point we can expect to hear the whines, the bleats, and the snivels: "I
don't care if we were led by the nose on the race issue by the Communists, it
was right!" If you think that our fractured and disintegrating society is
better even for the Blacks than the strong, confident, prosperous and peaceful
America before the "civil rights" revolution then you are truly living in a
dream world. Forced "integration" of widely differing peoples never works -- it
only destroys. History abounds with examples. Remember, most of the Third World
people who have been encouraged and allowed to come here are not America's real
enemies. They are only taking advantage of a situation created by America's
enemies. Their culture and survival, too, are in peril from the New World Order
multicultural agenda. America's enemies are those who created and are pushing
that agenda.
To oppose the genocidal program of the New World Order, we must say some things
that our masters have decided we are not supposed to say. They want to
"homogenize" us all and destroy all races and nations to fulfill their dream of
world conquest.
To destroy national and racial identity and feelings is their number one goal
-- because such feelings are the major stumbling block in the path of "one
world." Instead of armies, in America our enemies have conquered us by
infiltration of our government and our media -- they have conquered our minds
but they have not conquered all of us. Some of us know that we must oppose the
genocide of our people. We know in our hearts that we are not "haters," and
that our struggle for freedom and independence is not based on a hatred of
others or other cultures, for which we of course should show due respect, but
based instead upon a love for our children, and their children, and the
uncounted generations to come, and on a determination that the light
represented by our Western civilization shall never be extinguished.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was based on the American Dissident Voices program of 17th
December, 1994.
For a sample copy of National Vanguard Book's new publication, _Free Speech_
National Vanguard Books PO Box 330 Hillsboro WV 24946
d***@gmail.com
2012-08-11 10:09:25 UTC
Permalink
South Africa’s Ring of Fire

It was the COSATU Secretary General, arch Communist, and con man Zwelinzima Vavi, who described South Africa’s increasing rate of public protest as a "Ring of Fire" closing in on major cities that could result in a Tunisia style revolution. He also sent a warning to his own comrades in the ANC, saying the party needed to get its house in order or face a revolt similar to the 1976 riots against Bantu education.

Now that the country is burning far worse than it was during the 1976 riots, I believe it is logical to assume that Vavi’s words were in fact a threat -- (or maybe he was just bragging). Did he not also refer to the jobless youth as a “ticking time bomb” or words to that effect?

The 1976 riots in South Africa caused worldwide outrage and brought down international condemnation on the Apartheid government. One specific image, namely a black & white photograph of Hector Pieterson's dead body, was circulated all over the planet and shocked millions of viewers. Today, while various parts of South Africa burn in a ring of fire, in vivid colour, the international community have gone ominously silent. Right now I suppose the vast majority have their eyes focused on the 2012 London Olympics, but tomorrow there will be some other excuse for ignoring South Africa’s current predicament.

According to Professor Peter Alexander, Director of the Centre for Sociological Research:
http://tia-mysoa.blogspot.com/2012/08/south-africas-ring-of-fire.html
Post by d***@gmail.com
media Release
ANC is not interested in peaceful solution
The Boer Afrikaner Assembly noted with concern the increased racial tension that currently prevails in South Africa with references even reference to war reported in the media. The cause of this increased racial tension is the decision of the ANC his Youth League to intensify the the land grab program, as expressed by the acting President of the league, Ronald Lamola. The consequences are the increased attacks and murders of whites. The ANC regime will have to realize that a people can only so long and watch its members murdered without doing something about it. No nation can allow an organization like the ANC revolution taking place at the expense of that nation's members' property and lives. The Boer Afrikaner Assembly presented a peaceful solution to the ANC regime, but it is apparent that the ANC is not interested in a peaceful solution and is rather interested rather wishes an increase in ferocity of its members. Should the regime come to its senses, the Boer Afrikaner Assembly is still willing to talk to about die Boer African People's right to self-determination, that the only viable and peaceful solution to the racial tensions and threatening racial war in South Africa.
Boer Afrikaner Assembly
"It's Genocide"
Those who listen regularly to this program know that I am steadfastly opposed
to what is called "The New World Order," that is, I am opposed to the
establishment of world government under the United Nations and other
international entitles.
The establishment of world government, which is taking place now and has been
taking place since the War to Impose the New World Order ended in 1945, will
mean the end of American freedom.
We have reached the point where the President of the United States feels more
obligated to obtain United Nations permission for US military action than he
feels obligated to obtain authorization from Congress.
Since we are so far down this dangerous road, I think it is wise to step back
and look at the ostensible purposes of the United Nations, and how well its
actions stand up to its professed principles.
One of those professed principles is opposition to genocide, that is, the
attempted destruction of a people. Let us look at the UN's definition of
genocide.
-- Acts Constituting Genocide --
-- Article II --
In the present Convention, "genocide" means any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
----------
Genocide, by the above definition, applies to national groups, including
Americans; and ethnic groups, including people of European descent in the
United States and South Africa; as much as any other groups. It is my
contention that the people of European descent of this world are the targets of
a constant, consistent, systematic, sustained campaign of genocide, with the
intention of humiliating, subjugating, and eventually eliminating our people.
This is being accomplished on two levels: by means of both overt and covert
government coercion; and by means of both an open psychological warfare
campaign and, using sophisticated "psywar" techniques, a subliminal "psywar"
campaign.
Think about racial integration. The laws which formerly protected the freedom
of association of different racial groups, who in all of recorded history have
shown a strong tendency to segregate themselves and evinced a strong desire to
live among their own kind and by their own values, were all reversed by illegal
decrees of a leftist Supreme Court, until today freedom of association is
virtually illegal, except, so far, in the bedroom. All human societies, and
indeed all forms of higher life on this planet, require an exclusive territory
for their survival. Nations and species both defend their territories,
sometimes unto death, because that truth is graven upon their hearts at a very
deep, instinctual level. It is this inner knowledge of the need for an
exclusive territory that makes us naturally group together along ethnic lines
and makes our young men willing to fight and die to keep our territory -- our
country -- for ourselves. We cannot survive unless we have a territory
exclusively our own. Integration takes that away from us.
According to section C of the Genocide Convention, "genocide" is "Deliberately
inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part." One look at the interracial murder
and interracial rape statistics put out by the FBI is enough for any reasonable
person to see that Americans of European descent have been under a constant
physical assault, due in no small part to the promotion of "integration." And
"integration" has destroyed our criminal justice system; the guilty often go
unpunished or the innocent are persecuted, not on the basis of the evidence,
but based on the racial composition of the jury, which is acknowledged even by
the news media to be one of the most important factors in the outcome of a
trial.
One particularly horrible consequence of "integration" is the forced taking of
our innocent little children, some of them only five years old, and bussing
them into the Third World war zones that so many of our cities have become; or
bussing the warring gangs into our neighborhoods -- all in the name of
"integration." According to section E of the Genocide Convention, genocide is
defined as "Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group." Even
though decent and thoughtful members of many races have been against it from
the beginning, our masters are now accelerating a push to promote interracial
adoption as a government policy, opposition to which will be punishable by law.
This also fits the definition of genocide under section E.
Section B of the Genocide Convention defines genocide as "Causing serious
bodily or mental harm to members of the group." We have discussed bodily harm
-- what about mental harm? To be healthy, every child and every adult must have
a positive sense of identity. In the United States, our schools used to teach
our children about the positive contributions of our race, which founded
America and Western Civilization itself. We taught our children to respect the
cultures of other peoples, yes, but also to revere and honor our people's
achievements, from the _Iliad_ to Shakespeare, from Stonehenge to the
transistor to the walk on the moon. And they were acknowledged as _our_
achievements! But under the current regime of Political Correctness it is
considered evil to acknowledge the fact that ours is a European civilization.
Our achievements may not be mentioned in class or textbook unless in the same
breath an African, an Oriental, or a lesbian Communist is given equal billing,
and historical accuracy be damned!
The desire of people to live among their own kind is called "racism," and guilt
for this imagined sin is inculcated among our young people in almost every
book, television program, motion picture or even computer game that is made
available to them. They are told that their ancestors, who built America and
the West, were wrong and that only the Communist-inspired "civil rights"
revolution of the last few decades has finally set things right. They are
spoon-fed a moral outlook on the world in which anything which tends to the
survival and advancement of White Americans is deemed evil, and everything
which tends to our extinction is deemed good, by definition. This alien
morality, which does no race any good except our self-appointed masters, has
grievously injured two entire generations of our people. It is sick -- it is
evil -- and it is undoubtedly genocide -- "causing serious mental harm to the
members of the group."
Section D of the Genocide Convention defines genocide as "imposing measures
intended to prevent births within the group." Ask yourself this question: What
has been the demographic result of all the so-called "feminist" agitation of
the last few decades? Has it resulted in a significant reduction in the numbers
of the Third Worlders now crowding our cities? Are illegal Mexican immigrant
women or inner city welfare mothers now taking up careers and foregoing
children until they're nearly forty? Or is it traditional European-American
women who have decided that there are things more important than the creation
and raising of the next generation of our people?
We as a people are not even replacing ourselves. We are starting our families
later if at all, and few women have the three children necessary to maintain
our numbers. The promotion of abortion on demand has also made little dent in
the mushrooming population of non-Americans within our borders, but it has
convinced many millions of our own people that slaying their children in the
womb, for no better reason than personal convenience, is a good and laudable
idea. A whole generation has thus been killed and will never see the light of
day -- yet another reason why the portion of the population of European descent
is in precipitous decline.
Other anti-birth policies include the media and government campaigns to promote
and legitimize homosexuality.
Is there an identifiable power structure within America which is "imposing
measures intended to prevent births within the group"? You bet there is!
We have not yet addressed section A of the convention, "killing members of the
group," but when the New World Order boys have succeeded in disarming us we
shall see what their intentions really are in that regard.
Also ongoing is a slow war against us now being waged in our inner cities; and
there is also the fact, exposed many times on this program, that most of the
wars of this century have been engineered for the benefit of the New World
Order elitists -- and it is our fathers, brothers, and sons who do the dying.
Is multi-racialism genocide? Yes it is.
Is multi-culturalism genocide? Yes it is.
Is teaching minorities self esteem while teaching Whites "sensitivity"
genocide? Yes it is.
Is diversity indoctrination genecide? Yes it is.
Is toleration of illegal immigration genocide? Yes it is.
Is any non-White immigration, except perhaps for diplomatic and consular
representatives, genocide? Yes it is.
Do anti-discrimination laws constitute genocide? Yes they do.
Do "hate crime" laws constitute genocide? Yes they do.
Does support of convenience abortion constitute genocide? Yes it does.
Does promotion of homosexual-ity constitute genocide? Yes it does.
Is suppression of information on racial differences genocide? Yes it is.
Is inhibiting research on racial differences genocide? Yes it is.
Is "affirmative action" genocide? Yes it is.
Is the subliminal or overt promo-tion of interracial sex on TV genocide? Yes it
is.
Does failure to provide equal me-dia time to Whites to further their cause,
constitute genocide? Yes it does.
Does the undermining of loyalty of White Americans to their own people
constitute genocide? Yes it does.
Does undermining the sovereignty of our nation and the promotion of world
government constitute genocide? Yes it does.
It is not necessary to use gas chambers to commit genocide.
Some of our own people, in order to gain favor with a treacherous and disloyal
elite, find it to their own advantage to sacrifice the integrity of our country
and our people, for money or power. Some of our people would rather surrender
and grovel than fight. As long as they are able to go along to get along, they
pretend to ignore the decay and collapse of our civilization brought about as a
direct result of the genecidal program being imposed upon us. I believe the day
is coming when they must answer for their treason. If that day does come, and I
believe it will, they will find their answers falling on deaf ears. 'Treason,
how be it punished...?"
Those who promote the New World Order today are the spiritual and in some cases
the physical cousins of those who founded Communism. Though the overtly
Communist attempt at world government foundered on its economic failures, we
make a big mistake if we think that the danger is passed. Those who created
Communism in the first place as an instrument for world control are very much
alive, and their evil dream of world government is now being achieved. They
have always been friendly toward Communism, though they favor its objectives
secretly. They use code words like "restoring democracy" while they impose
Communist tyrannies on South Africa and Haiti. They hate all races, but they
especially hate our race -- for our nations, once awakened, have the potential
for defeating their evil schemes.
Let us see whether or not the current plan for "integration" matches Communist
objectives.
England's leading Communist writer in the early part of the twentieth century
had long range plans for the race problem.
He had this to say in his book, _A Racial Program for the 20th Century_, as
"In America, we will aim for a subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro
minority against the whites, we will endeavour to instill in the whites a guilt
complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise
to prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of
sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negroes will be able to
intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to
our cause." (Check the Record, it's really there!)
Well, there it is. Straight from the horse's mouth. I want you to pay
particular attention to the statement, and I emphasize: "...we will endeavour
to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the
Negroes." Despite the fall of the Soviet Union, the Soviet psychological
warfare people, with the help of their agents of influence in the West, have
succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
Now, I personally believe it is time to undo, by every legal means possible,
the greatest Soviet psychological warfare triumph. In fact it is the greatest
triumph for any psychological warfare campaign ever waged -- racial
"integration" in the United States. Of course the Communists' powerful allies
helped, and these "helpers" are very much with us today in America.
In 1928 Communist writer Joseph Pogany was sent to the United States by Moscow
with the mission of implementing the Soviet racial agenda in America. Writing
in the Communist newspaper, _The Daily Worker_, under the name of Joseph
Schwartz, this Communist laid out his party's program for the racial
destruction of this country.
1. Abolition of the whole system of race discrimination and insure full racial
equality;
2. Insure the Negroes the right to vote;
3. Abolish all Jim Crow laws and forbid discrimination against Negroes in
selling or renting houses;
4. Abolish all laws forbidding intermarriage of persons of different races;
5. Assure full integration of public schools and universities;
6. The equal admittance of Negroes to railway stations, waiting rooms, hotels,
restaurants and theaters;
7. Full integration of the Army and Navy;
8. Allow Negroes to join all labor unions;
9. Equal employment opportunities for Negroes.
Now, do these measures have a familiar ring to them? Of course they do.
This is what became the American "civil rights" movement. This was the
blueprint. People tell us that "integration" will make us a better and stronger
country. Do you believe that the Soviets would have done anything to make our
country stronger or better? Do you expect me to believe that? To anyone who was
gullible enough to accept all or any part of this agenda I say this: Lenin had
an expression for you. He would refer to those in the West who consciously or
unconsciously served Soviet interests as his "useful idiots."
At this point we can expect to hear the whines, the bleats, and the snivels: "I
don't care if we were led by the nose on the race issue by the Communists, it
was right!" If you think that our fractured and disintegrating society is
better even for the Blacks than the strong, confident, prosperous and peaceful
America before the "civil rights" revolution then you are truly living in a
dream world. Forced "integration" of widely differing peoples never works -- it
only destroys. History abounds with examples. Remember, most of the Third World
people who have been encouraged and allowed to come here are not America's real
enemies. They are only taking advantage of a situation created by America's
enemies. Their culture and survival, too, are in peril from the New World Order
multicultural agenda. America's enemies are those who created and are pushing
that agenda.
To oppose the genocidal program of the New World Order, we must say some things
that our masters have decided we are not supposed to say. They want to
"homogenize" us all and destroy all races and nations to fulfill their dream of
world conquest.
To destroy national and racial identity and feelings is their number one goal
-- because such feelings are the major stumbling block in the path of "one
world." Instead of armies, in America our enemies have conquered us by
infiltration of our government and our media -- they have conquered our minds
but they have not conquered all of us. Some of us know that we must oppose the
genocide of our people. We know in our hearts that we are not "haters," and
that our struggle for freedom and independence is not based on a hatred of
others or other cultures, for which we of course should show due respect, but
based instead upon a love for our children, and their children, and the
uncounted generations to come, and on a determination that the light
represented by our Western civilization shall never be extinguished.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was based on the American Dissident Voices program of 17th
December, 1994.
For a sample copy of National Vanguard Book's new publication, _Free Speech_
National Vanguard Books PO Box 330 Hillsboro WV 24946
Loading...